Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

48VDC from 120VDC needs to be isolated

Status
Not open for further replies.

cupoftea

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
3,059
Helped
62
Reputation
124
Reaction score
139
Trophy points
63
Activity points
15,965
Hi,
For an automotive bus, if you have say a 120Vdc (or higher) bus from the [source] on the car...and you want to convert it to 48Vdc, 100A, then would you need isolation? I assume its a regulatory thing?
 

if so, you need to locate, and then read, the regs
--- Updated ---

in fact, and in actuality, you get a better converter if you use a transformer ...
 
in fact, and in actuality, you get a better converter if you use a transformer ..
Thanks, yes, and in fact i think you mean eg as in the leakage inductor in a full bridge SMPS acting as a turn on snubber?
Also, the ZVS switching that you can get in a PSFB.
Do you think say a couple of paralleled PSFB's offers much advantage over a couple of paralleled full bridge's at 120vdc input and 48v, 100A output?

And these days, with quick data rates...i am actually wondering, about having a couple of paralleled converters with a single error amplifier looking at vout and feeding each PWM comparator.....but digitising the error voltage , and feeding it to each pwm comparator.....then DAC'ing it back to analog for input to the PWM comparators?

This seems preferable to having an analog error voltage getting bussed around the expanse of a couple of big power stages...with noise problems and what have you. I mean, the error voltage could be turned into PWM say, then easily converted back to analog, with say a filter? A high enough frequency PWM would only need light filtering, and thus not introduce too heavy (low frequency) pole into the feedback loop.
 
Last edited:

I like the notion of disaggregating the control section
from the switch*magnetics section. There are PWM
controller ICs with digital outputs, there are digital
isolators and isolated FET drivers, the feedback only
needs to be itself isolated without bothering the
control loop stability / performance (current sense
would be tougher but believe I've seen that too,
in isolated forms). Managine or combining N current
sense feedbacks, that could be "interesting" (we did
this in ICs with multiple sense comparators in a
cellular "power farm", but at board level different
"stuff" might apply).

Depending on your end market sourcing appropriately
rated and qualified magnetics for 100A at all, let alone
fitting allotted volume and mass, might be your
biggest problem. A good argument for parallelism
I expect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top