yes when changing the timestep from 3.6e-8 to 1e-10 i got 26.9MHz,
please what is the rule if my oscillator say, to operate at 100MHz....
No fixed rule. Reducing the timestep makes the results more accurate, but if the timestep is too small, then the simulation takes too long to run. (I get bored if I have to wait more than 1 or 2 seconds).
When I simulate audio circuits, I normally use 1000 steps for each cycle of the waveform, but that is only because I want very accurate distortion measurements. e.g. For a 1KHz signal, I set min timestep = 1uS.
For this kind of circuit, accuracy is less important so 100 steps per cycle is probably OK. If you don't know what timestep to use for a circuit, reduce it in stages. When reducing it further doesn't make a difference, then it is low enough.
btw, If you want to make a radio transmitter, have a look at this website:
Harry's Homebrew Homepage. It has some great circuits for FM radio and radio controlled models. There's even a couple of simple TV transmitters.
and say: At 27MHz, the transistor works as a common base which has no phase diffirence B/W collector o/p and emitter i/p.
Yes the transistor works as common base, but at high frequencies there is some phase difference B/W collector o/p and emitter i/p.
For example, if the transition frequency of the transistor = 200MHz, then the phase difference will be 45 degrees at 200MHz, 30 degrees at 100MHz, and 6 Degrees at 20 MHz.