ashish.mw
Full Member level 2
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2011
- Messages
- 121
- Helped
- 15
- Reputation
- 30
- Reaction score
- 14
- Trophy points
- 1,298
- Location
- India
- Activity points
- 2,236
Hello everyone,
Please locate the attached file which contains the simulated results (of HFSS) of negative permeable SRR metamaterial. The results contains S11 and S21 plot, extracted effective permeability (by NRW approach), Poynting vector plot, E-field and H-field plots.
Please help me explain the orientations of the above mentioned three vector plots.
Had it been a DNG metamaterial, there would have been a backward wave i.e. the propagation vetor (k) and the poynting vector (S) would have been in opposite directions.
Is this true for mu-negative materials as well? As there is no transmission but there is obvious reflection of incident wave in MNG materials, which i suppose explains the existence of backward wave for MNG materials. Am i correct?
Please explain the vector plots. I shall be highly obliged.
Thanks in advance.
View attachment Help_SRR.rar
Please locate the attached file which contains the simulated results (of HFSS) of negative permeable SRR metamaterial. The results contains S11 and S21 plot, extracted effective permeability (by NRW approach), Poynting vector plot, E-field and H-field plots.
Please help me explain the orientations of the above mentioned three vector plots.
Had it been a DNG metamaterial, there would have been a backward wave i.e. the propagation vetor (k) and the poynting vector (S) would have been in opposite directions.
Is this true for mu-negative materials as well? As there is no transmission but there is obvious reflection of incident wave in MNG materials, which i suppose explains the existence of backward wave for MNG materials. Am i correct?
Please explain the vector plots. I shall be highly obliged.
Thanks in advance.
View attachment Help_SRR.rar