The SG3524 is really intended to be a push-pull driver and the PWM duty cycle controlled to stabilize the output voltage. For a normal sine wave inverter you can use push-pull drive but you need the DC to be twice the peak AC voltage, in other words about 625V. The method used in most designs is to use a H-bridge so the voltage can be halved and the polarity alternated to produce both positive and negative half cycles. I'm not sure the SG3524 will allow 0% to 100% duty cycle adjustment to produce your 50/60Hz output either. Its a good choice for producing the DC ahead of a H-bridge but I think the bridge driving signals need a more precise control method.
Brian.
All PWM inverters are relatively complicated and most use a microprocessor to generate the timing signals. If you look around on this forum there are several threads about sine wave inverters running at the moment, some with schematics. All PWM sine converters start with a DC supply equal to peak AC voltage so you can still use the SG3524 to drive the DC supply generator. Its only the output H-bridge that needs special drive signals.
Brian.
You can contact me through my web site, it is listed in my profile. I has disabled direct mailing from here due to the number of people asking me for help when it would be better to ask publicly here. It would be better if you moved this thread to the "Power Electronics" thread though, you will find people with more expertize than me in that part of the forum. Quote the page address of this thread in the first message so people can refer back to what has been said already.
Brian.
Not that I would wish to claim mine is any better or workable.
Off on a rant..
One thing I fail to understand is why this 'question' is being presented as an end of course/final year project and nothing seems to have moved on beyond using something like a, not, modern day equivalent of a TL494...
Not that I have advanced much further and obviously it can be done with a PIC processor. Excuse me whilst I laugh in that general direction.
For your delectation I present...
Based on one of these..
https://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/uc3827-1.pdf
blah here
**broken link removed**
Ignoring the blah then, with trepidation, the results according to LTSpice are..
So my harmonics are 80dB down.. That qualifies as Hi-Fi. Not that I would expect to achieve that in reality and I am sure it would burp or break elsewhere plus you can see QBODGE hanging about the place.
I might be sure it will not 'work' but I would be tempted to 'hit it'
I met this 'student' problem some time back in 1996 and they are still running it and there still seems to be the same lack of education that results in 'enforced' efforts at rubbish solutions.
Not that I would wish to claim mine is any better or workable.
I could still run the numbers.
That still leaves the OP out on a post because quite frankly I am stupefied that the 'Lecturer' in charge of this project offered it, again after so many years, in the first place. I don't get it.. How did we advance from TL494 to SG3524 and so rapidly.
I know nothing but SMPS, in its horrible glory and the associated Loop Compensation is conceptually HARD. Obviously if you have a PIC then you just change the bit you divide something by and hope things don't go BANG whilst you were looking elsewhere. In the mean time it would seem your PIC still has to deal with the loop compensation.
Woot
https://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042507-092653/unrestricted/MQP_D_1_2.pdf
Our project failed because we were not taught stuff and did not have stuff and could not buy stuff so it was stuffed. Please follow our example.
Genome.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?