testing one db compression point
??? Is 1-dB point not an important figure of merit ???...... this is the 1st time i hear such an assertion.
There are some out-band blocker specification to the whole receiver, while IP3 is measured as an in-band characteristic with 2-tone test, an out-band interferer(also know as BLOCKER) could degenerate the signal gain of LNA and lower down the sensitivity.
For most case, the difference between IIP3 and input 1-dB compression point is about 8~10 dB. With some special tenique, we can improve IIP3. But the difference between IIP3 and 1-dB point may not be 8~10dB. If you desided not to take 1dB point as a spec. when you design the system, watch out if you pass the out-band blocker test or not...
As the original question about "IIP3 circle"....... I've seen one paper mentioning this strange methodology, but i suggest you take a glance at K.L.Feng 's paper which discussing IM3 characteristic of common emitter stage. And you'll find that -- different type matching network will give rise to different IM3 characteristic. It depends on what is the impedance looking into the signal source at freqency (w2-w1). For most case of LNA, there is a DC blocking capacitor at input port, and this cap. limits the impedance looking backward. Feng proposed a solution in another IEEE paper .
As for 1-dB point, some stretagy i know to improve it is as follows-- DC current, trasistor sizing, inductive RFC bias choke, dual bias feed (proposed by Japanese, but this is a modified version of PA linearizing technique),etc...
or.....just put a resistor shunting at the input port, this is the fastest and easiest way. 8)