Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Retrieve the effective parameters of metamaterial

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

bitele

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Aug 17, 2008
Messages
34
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,468
Ab initio numerical simulation of left-handed metamaterials: Comparison of calculations and experiments

Determination of effective permittivity and permeability of metamaterials from reflection and transmission coefficients

Resonant and antiresonant frequency dependence of the effective parameters of metamaterials

Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials

Effective parameters of resonant negative refractive index metamaterials: Interpretation and validity
Transmission properties and effective electromagnetic parameters of double negative metamaterials

Electromagnetic parameter retrieval from inhomogeneous metamaterials

Determination of the effective parameters of a metamaterial by field summation method


Retrieval of the effective constitutive parameters of bianisotropic metamaterials

Effective Medium Theory of Left-Handed Materials

Homogenization of metamaterials by field averaging

Local constitutive parameters of metamaterials from an effective-medium perspective
Experimental retrieval of the effective parameters of metamaterials based on a waveguide method

Design, Fabrication, and Testing of Double Negative Metamaterials



Direct calculation of permeability and permittivity for a left-handed metamaterial

Extraction of effective metamaterial parameters by parameter fitting of dispersive models


Effective Modeling of Double Negative Metamaterial Macrostructures

INVESTIGATION OF EFFECTIVE PERMITTIVITY AND PERMEABILITY FOR A NOVEL V-SHAPED METAMATERIAL USING SIMULATED S-PARAMETERS


Micro-and macroscopic simulation of periodic metamaterials


What is the different of them?
 

Read some of those papers? The fourth from the top, the Robust one by Chen et al, is one of the best. Begin with that and actually read the references listed in it. This is pretty well-understood and straightforward.
 

katko said:
Read some of those papers? The fourth from the top, the Robust one by Chen et al, is one of the best. Begin with that and actually read the references listed in it. This is pretty well-understood and straightforward.
Click to expand...
hi
now i have read this paper---- "Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials", but i can't understand part B. why should we determine the effective boundary and thickness? and why isn't the effective thickness identical to the cell thickness?
 

Hello everyone!
I am trying to implement the equations from the article "Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials",in MATLAB and I have done the first part. I am confused though on how to proceed with the second part for the determination of m for the correct branch (equation 7 in the paper). I have already finished the code that gives me the correct e and mu, but I would like to improve the results using the method from Chen's paper.Could anyone give me a hint?
Thank you all!!!!
 
Is it correct to say the imaginary part of permittivity and permeability should be positive? (mentioned in this paper)
 

**broken link removed**
 

    V

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
By this paper, **broken link removed**
How to load the S-parameters data from CST to the matlab code it gives?

Does anyone have the same question?
 

    V

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
If you are simulating the metamaterial, use field averaging.

If you are retrieving from measured S parameters, use Chen.
 

% RUN SMITH EXAMPLE ON CST

directory = pwd;
% START CST STUDIO
cst = actxserver('CSTStudio.application');

% OPEN MWS MODEL
mws = invoke(cst, 'OpenFile', [directory '\Smith_Parameter_Extraction_Working.cst']);

% START SOLVER
fdsolver = invoke(mws, 'FDSolver');
invoke(fdsolver, 'Start');
invoke(mws, 'Save');

% RETRIEVE RESULT
absS11 = invoke(mws, 'Result1D','a1(1)1(1)');
angS11 = invoke(mws, 'Result1D','p1(1)1(1)');
absS21 = invoke(mws, 'Result1D','a2(1)1(1)');
angS21 = invoke(mws, 'Result1D','p2(1)1(1)');

% STORE RESULT IN .TXT FILE
invoke(absS11, 'Save', [directory '\absS11.txt']);
invoke(angS11, 'Save', [directory '\angS11.txt']);
invoke(absS21, 'Save', [directory '\absS21.txt']);
invoke(angS21, 'Save', [directory '\angS21.txt']);
invoke(mws, 'Save');
invoke(mws, 'Quit');

release(absS11);
release(angS11);
release(fdsolver);
release(mws);
release(cst);
 

    V

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
It's important to note that there is a branching ambiguity due to the arc cosine function. This issue causes some regions in the calculated spectrum, for the real part of the refractive index, to have the wrong sign or amplitude. As a result, these regions require correction by hand. The "Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials" outlines an approach to determing the correct branching parameter m. There is another approach that I like more, which implements the Kramers Kronig relationships. This can be found in "A Unique Extraction of Metamaterial Parameters Based on Kramers–Kronig Relationship."
 
This is a great list, but don't forget about the field averaging method!
 

Rrumpf, please post your code and references. Also, does anyone have any nonlinear or anistropic metamaterial effective parameter extraction codes?

rrumpf said:
This is a great list, but don't forget about the field averaging method!
Click to expand...
 

satyakesh said:
plz upload ur code
Click to expand...
I wrote this code
Is that right?

Code: 
clc
% extracted values of frequency %

f=[30.0 , 30.625, 31.25, 31.875,32.500,33.125,33.750,34.375,35.000,35.625,36.2500,36.8750,37.5000,38.1250,38.750,39.3750,40.0000,40.6250,41.2500,41.8750,42.5000,43.12500,43.75000,44.37500,45.00000,45.6250,46.2500,46.8750,47.5000,48.1250,48.7500,49.3750,50.0000]

% s11 parameter %

s11=[-1.56 ,-1.80 ,-2.05,-2.33,-2.6504,-3.0252,-3.4710,-4.0084,-4.6659,-5.4769,-6.4890,-7.7728,-9.434,-11.6765,-14.7990,-19.919,-33.7676,-24.888,-17.720,-14.089,-11.767,-10.1313,-8.92165,-8.00691,-7.3044,-6.766008,-6.3570,-6.05145,-5.83227,-5.6948,-5.6225,-5.6197,-5.6727]

%extracted s21 parameter from simulation%

s21=[-5.19,-4.70,-4.25,-3.82,-3.411,-3.003,-2.601,-2.207,-1.822,-1.454,-1.110,-0.8003,-0.5318,-0.3126,-0.1526,-0.0508,-0.0078,-0.0208,-0.08314,-0.17887,-0.30498,-0.44897,-0.60147,-0.75405,-0.8998,-1.0334,-1.1489,-1.2454,-1.3220,-1.3707,-1.3972,-1.3981,-1.3782]
    
% formula from IEEE paper %

n=(acos((1./(2.*s21)).*(1-(s11).^2-(s21).^2)))./1.6; % Index %

z=sqrt(((1+s11).^2)-(s21).^2)./(((1-s11).^2)-(s21).^2); % Impedence %



plot(f, real(n), 'blue', f, imag(n), 'r');
title('index');
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mamase said:
I wrote this code
Is that right?
clc
% extracted values of frequency %

f=[30.0 , 30.625, 31.25, 31.875,32.500,33.125,33.750,34.375,35.000,35.625,36.2500,36.8750,37.5000,38.1250,38.750,39.3750,40.0000,40.6250,41.2500,41.8750,42.5000,43.12500,43.75000,44.37500,45.00000,45.6250,46.2500,46.8750,47.5000,48.1250,48.7500,49.3750,50.0000]

% s11 parameter %

s11=[-1.56 ,-1.80 ,-2.05,-2.33,-2.6504,-3.0252,-3.4710,-4.0084,-4.6659,-5.4769,-6.4890,-7.7728,-9.434,-11.6765,-14.7990,-19.919,-33.7676,-24.888,-17.720,-14.089,-11.767,-10.1313,-8.92165,-8.00691,-7.3044,-6.766008,-6.3570,-6.05145,-5.83227,-5.6948,-5.6225,-5.6197,-5.6727]

%extracted s21 parameter from simulation%

s21=[-5.19,-4.70,-4.25,-3.82,-3.411,-3.003,-2.601,-2.207,-1.822,-1.454,-1.110,-0.8003,-0.5318,-0.3126,-0.1526,-0.0508,-0.0078,-0.0208,-0.08314,-0.17887,-0.30498,-0.44897,-0.60147,-0.75405,-0.8998,-1.0334,-1.1489,-1.2454,-1.3220,-1.3707,-1.3972,-1.3981,-1.3782]

% formula from IEEE paper %

n=(acos((1./(2.*s21)).*(1-(s11).^2-(s21).^2)))./1.6; % Index %

z=sqrt(((1+s11).^2)-(s21).^2)./(((1-s11).^2)-(s21).^2); % Impedence %



plot(f, real(n), 'blue', f, imag(n), 'r');
title('index');
Click to expand...

I think It's wrong.
S11 and S21 in these formulae must be complex number while you used the value of S11 and S21 in dB.

Right?
 

nvt088 said:
I think It's wrong.
S11 and S21 in these formulae must be complex number while you used the value of S11 and S21 in dB.

Right?
Click to expand...
Thank you for your Guidance
How can I extract them In that form from HFSS?
 

I upload an thesis only talking about Retrieval Method of Parameters here. It's very detailed in Simulation and Others.
They used method from paper of Xudong Chen. They also provided Matlab code in Appendixad. It's very useful.
Hope that it will help you
 

Attachments

  • Thesis EXTRACTING MATERIAL CONSTITUTIVE PARAMETERS FROM SCATTERING PARAMETERS.pdf
    15.5 MB · Views: 314

nvt088 said:
I upload an thesis only talking about Retrieval Method of Parameters here. It's very detailed in Simulation and Others.
They used method from paper of Xudong Chen. They also provided Matlab code in Appendixad. It's very useful.
Hope that it will help you
Click to expand...
thank you but where is the thesis?Where did you upload?
 

mamase said:
thank you but where is the thesis?Where did you upload?
Click to expand...

Sorry, may be there is some problem.
You type "extracting material constitutive parameters from scattering parameters" on Google, and Find the Master Thesis about it.
Best
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top