Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

proof that 2+2 = 5 weird

Status
Not open for further replies.
lightning r fun

lightning r fun

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Oct 26, 2010
Messages
38
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
10
Trophy points
1,288
Location
oklahoma
Activity points
1,592
Start with: -20 = -20
Which is the same as: 16-36 = 25-45
Which can also be expressed as: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5
Add 81/4 to both sides: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) + 81/4 = 52) 9 X 5 + 81/4
Rearrange the terms: ({2+2}) 9/2) 2 = (5-9/2) 2
Ergo: 2+2 - 9/2 = 5
Hence: 2 + 2 = 5
 

"(2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5" , ı didn't understand what this is. I guess there is a problem with the paranthesis or? where is the equal sign? what is "52) 9 x 5"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bond91

    B

    bond91

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
keremcant said:
"(2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5" , ı didn't understand what this is. I guess there is a problem with the paranthesis or? where is the equal sign? what is "52) 9 x 5"?
Click to expand...
The title says weird, so no surprise there are weird operators that no one could understand. May be it's a math written in the bible.
 
Start with: -20 = -20
OK

Which is the same as: 16-36 = 25-45
OK

Which can also be expressed as: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) = 52) 9 X 5
:shock:
Must have been written: (2+2)² - 9x(2+2) = 5² - 9x5

Add 81/4 to both sides: (2+2) 2 (9 X (2+2) + 81/4 = 52) 9 X 5 + 81/4
Must have been written: (2+2)² - 9x(2+2) + 81/4 = 5² - 9x5 + 81/4

Rearrange the terms: ({2+2}) 9/2) 2 = (5-9/2) 2
Must have been written: ((2+2) - 9/2)² = (5 - 9/2)²
[step a]

Ergo: 2+2 - 9/2 = 5
Must have been written: (2+2) - 9/2 = 5 - 9/2
[step b]

Hence: 2 + 2 = 5

Allelujah! you just discover what (-1/2)² = (1/2)² but -1/2 <> 1/2 (steps a and b)
 
thank you for clearing that up.
and for figuring out how to write the little 2.
 

Click on "Go Advanced" and use the special characters palette at right side.

Or press ALT 253 (this may not work according the character set selected)
 

here is one that works better:
-20=-20 (it is fact)
16-36=25-45 (16-36=-20,25-45=-20)
4^2-36 = 5^2-45 (4^2=16,5^2=25)
4^2-36 = 5^2-45
4^2-2.4.9/2 = 5^2-2.5.9/2 (2.4.9/2=36,2.5.9/2=45)
4^2-2.4.9/2 +(9/2)^2 = 5^2-2.5.9/2 +(9/2)^2 (adding both the sides (9/2)^2
[4-(9/2)]^2 = [5-(9/2)]^2 (let 4=a,9/2=b)
4-(9/2) = 5-(9/2)
4 = 5
2+2 = 5

---------- Post added at 11:35 ---------- Previous post was at 11:34 ----------

here's another one

Let x be a non-zero number, and set y=x. Thus:
x = y
x^2 = xy
x^2-y^2 = xy-y^2
(x+y)(x-y) = y(x-y)
x+y = y
2y = y
2 = 1
1 = 0
Now since 2+2 = 2+2+0 and we apply the lemma proof so that 0 = 1, 2+2+0 = 2+2+1 =5
THEREFORE
2+2 = 5
 
super............. very cute..........
 
Last edited:

It's not cute ..
Square root of negative number or division by zero make your "maths" really weird ..

:wink:
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrWhoF

    D

    DrWhoF

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
IanP said:
It's not cute ..
Square root of negative number or division by zero make your "maths" really weird ..

:wink:
Click to expand...

One man's boring trivialities might be another one's amusement. ;-)
 

a / a = 1, a <> 0
How about NaN / NaN = ?
NaN = Not a Number.
 

saying 0=0;
then 0*5 =0*4;
thus 4=5
things like this r complete bullshit....
 

the equation comes to a point where [4-(9/2)]² = [5-(9/2)]²
This is where the error begins, this is not equal to [4-(9/2)] = [5-(9/2)]

you have to use square root at both sides to simplify
√[4-(9/2)]² = √[5-(9/2)]²

There is a special theorem that deals with this: SQRT(a²) = |a| (absolute value of a)

so the above equation becomes
|4-(9/2)| = |5-(9/2)|
|-0.5| = |0.5|
0.5 = 0.5

I'm afraid the magic is lost
Alex
 
whoa what an info..but in one of the expression why do 81/4 need to be added in both sides:???:

-sorry guys but im not that good in numbers the thing is i got dizzy just by seeing those(except when the figures has money related:-D)
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top