Farado
Newbie level 2
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2010
- Messages
- 2
- Helped
- 1
- Reputation
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
- Trophy points
- 1,283
- Location
- Athens , Greece
- Activity points
- 1,306
Hello all. This is my first post in this forum. In advance , many thanks to everyone here , since I have found many posts really helpful , concerning HFSS and its issues that come across when designing. After doing some research in the forum posts , I did not find something matching my situation. So , I have the following "problem" :
I have successfully simulated a probe fed patch antenna , following the exact instructions in the HFSS manual. The S-parameters are quite good , about ~-20dB , depending on the central frequency. When the antenna is simulated "by itself" (using an Airbox) the total gain radiation pattern is as expected. However , when the antenna is used inside air (air surrounding the whole antenna , in order to simulate real conditions) , there is a significant secondary radiation field at the bottom of the patch , at the coax feed.
My question is : Are there any ways in order to further decrease the S-parameters of the patch antenna , or are there any design tips in order to reduce the secondary field? In addition , if anyone has any papers to suggest for further reading that would help to resolve this issue , I would really appreciate it.
Thanks in advance!
I have successfully simulated a probe fed patch antenna , following the exact instructions in the HFSS manual. The S-parameters are quite good , about ~-20dB , depending on the central frequency. When the antenna is simulated "by itself" (using an Airbox) the total gain radiation pattern is as expected. However , when the antenna is used inside air (air surrounding the whole antenna , in order to simulate real conditions) , there is a significant secondary radiation field at the bottom of the patch , at the coax feed.
My question is : Are there any ways in order to further decrease the S-parameters of the patch antenna , or are there any design tips in order to reduce the secondary field? In addition , if anyone has any papers to suggest for further reading that would help to resolve this issue , I would really appreciate it.
Thanks in advance!