Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Symmetry Boundary (PMC/PEC) in HFSS - Pattern Problems

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zangetsu57

Member level 4
Member level 4
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
70
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,944
pmc hfss

Hello everyone,

I am simulating a patch antenna that has H-plane symmetry. It is operating in the lowest mode. I get excellent impedance matching results for S11, but my radiation pattern (co-pol and x-pol) for both principal planes is not accurate when compared to the antenna simulated without the symmetry plane. Does anyone know why this might be? Is there something I need to do to tell HFSS to properly calculate the radiation pattern when using a symmetry plane?

Alternatively, if someone could link me or upload an example or tutorial as to how I should properly set up a symmetry plane, it would be greatly appreciated. Note that I DID use the impedance multiplier of 0.5 and set the port to solve Zpv.

Thank you in advance!
 

pmc boundary symmetry

hi

well i havent used HFSS that much but all i can say is you need to make sure that your antenna is symmetric with respect to your chosen symmetry planes os more specifically w.r.t your excitation port

i hope it helps

regards
 

hfss symmetry boundary conditions

Hello shahid78,

It understand that :). The patch antenna I am simulating has H-plane symmetry, so I was using a PMC symmetry plane to cut it in half.

It turns out that the scale was off on my graphs, as I had a -300 dB null at broadside on the x-pol at broadside for the H-plane, so that was distorting the graph. Silly me for not looking at the scale :p. My H-plane co-pol and x-pol now match the results I got for the patch without the PMC boundary.

The E-plane, however, has a slight problem. The co-pol is fine, but the x-pol is computed to be zero when using the symmetry boundary. It is definitely not zero, and the original model predicts it to be, while small, about -60 dB. Then again, when the x-pol is this small, who cares, right? I have a feeling this might have to do with boundary conditions. Nevertheless, if there is a way around this, it would be nice to compute the x-pol for the E-plane as it may be significant for other designs. Does anyone have any ideas?

I attached my models here.

Thanks in advance!
 

I checked the HFSS design you posted.
I don't see how with this antenna geometry you can utilize an E-plane for symmetry purposes ....
Electric field will always be parallel to the symmetry plane, so you can only use an H-plane symmetry plane.
Otherwise, I have misunderstood something.
 
  • Like
Reactions: apeet

    apeet

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top