Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Different Corners in Simulation

Status
Not open for further replies.

kumar_eee

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
814
Helped
139
Reputation
276
Reaction score
113
Trophy points
1,323
Location
Bangalore,India
Activity points
4,677
What are all the different corners available & why do we need to simulate it?.
 

If you mean postlayout simulation, we simulate to double check STA results (ensuring there were no bad constraints) and also to check what STA does not cover (asynchronous paths). We can simulate at any corner STA is run, since we need SDF to be generated, but normally only a subset of corners is simulated due to runtime.
 

kumar_eee said:
What are all the different corners available & why do we need to simulate it?.

"Corner" in the context of circuit simulation means "models" corresponding to extreme process conditions. These models include device (Spice) models, which are called "fast" (low Vt, high Ion), "slow" (high Vt, low Ion), and their combinations corresponding to independent variations of PMOS and NMOS device (fast-fast, fast-slow, etc.). Also, these models include BEOL (back-end-of-line) models - i.e. multilayer metal/dielectric stack parameters (layer thicknesses, dielectric constants, resistivities, etc.) - in which case they are called by possible combination of words "capacitance/resistance" and "best/worst" ("best" meaning lowest value of parasitic R and C etc.).

"Corner" modeling is supposed to "guardband" the design against process variations that happen due to manufacturing effects (i.e. variations over wafer or over chip, as well as wafer-to-wafer and lot-to-lot variations) and due to microscopic physical effects (i.e. doping density variation in the channel of MOSFETs due to discretness of implants and due to polycrystalline gate structure, line-edge-roughness of poly-Si gates, and so on).

"Corner" modeling results in an over-guardbanding of chip design (i.e. sub-optimal performance).
 

    kumar_eee

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top