mixaloybas
Junior Member level 1
can you bond to the esd mat
Hello everybody,
I have a 130nm CMOS IC that has no ESD protection, and I am in the phase of making the test PCB for it. The chip is not packaged, it is a bare die. So, it will be wirebonded on the pcb (using a K&S4522 manual wirebonder).
An ic at 130nm and with no esd protection needs to be processed in a class 0 esd assembly environment (that is HBM<250Volts), otherwise it will probably be damaged.
I am wondering if there are any measures to take in order to increase the yield.
A list follows including what I have come to so far:
1.Regarding the Human body model -> use of esd safe table mat, esd wrist straps, or even esd floor
2.Regarding the charged device model --> the chip will be unpackaged only in the esd protected area (that is on the esd table mat, by an operator with wrist strap). Also any insulator (which can hold charge) will be in a safe distance
3.Regarding the Machine Model -> I have concluded that it is better to have already soldered all the other components, and leave the wirebonding of the IC at the end. I don't know however if the head of the wirebonder gets charged electrostaticly, at which rates and what voltages to expect...Before the wirebonder, there is also the die bonder in action.
I believe that a wise wirebonding sequence would be like this:
gnd
IO
gnd
IO
...
That is, the first pad to bond probably has to be a ground (unless there is a gate directly connected to gnd). This first bonding will probably (I hope) not hurt the IC (At this time there will only be a connection of the IC and the PCB via the adhesive - should the adhesive be electrically conductive or nor?) What is more, if the wirebonder head had some electrostatic voltage, it will probably be discharged.. So, the next bonding could be to a more sensitive IO pad.
If there is a process that accumulates charge in the wirebonder head, maybe after some time the voltage of the head is increased again. That's why I propose to bond successively one gnd after one IO pad, so that any accumulated charge gets away.
Another idea, especially useful for the first bonding could be to inverse the loop of the wire bonding. What I mean is, first touch the PCB, so that the voltages of pcb and wirebonder head equalize, and then the ic.
Maybe, the pcb can include shorts in a clever way, so that esd events take a more controlled current path.
Anyway, these are just thoughts, which I cannot evaluate...
So, if anyone has experience in wirebonding very sensitive ICs, I would appreciate if they could comment on my thoughts, if there is any reasoning behind them. Or, preferably, provide some tips that are known to have good results
Any answer is welcome!
Thank you very much in advance,
mixaloybas
Hello everybody,
I have a 130nm CMOS IC that has no ESD protection, and I am in the phase of making the test PCB for it. The chip is not packaged, it is a bare die. So, it will be wirebonded on the pcb (using a K&S4522 manual wirebonder).
An ic at 130nm and with no esd protection needs to be processed in a class 0 esd assembly environment (that is HBM<250Volts), otherwise it will probably be damaged.
I am wondering if there are any measures to take in order to increase the yield.
A list follows including what I have come to so far:
1.Regarding the Human body model -> use of esd safe table mat, esd wrist straps, or even esd floor
2.Regarding the charged device model --> the chip will be unpackaged only in the esd protected area (that is on the esd table mat, by an operator with wrist strap). Also any insulator (which can hold charge) will be in a safe distance
3.Regarding the Machine Model -> I have concluded that it is better to have already soldered all the other components, and leave the wirebonding of the IC at the end. I don't know however if the head of the wirebonder gets charged electrostaticly, at which rates and what voltages to expect...Before the wirebonder, there is also the die bonder in action.
I believe that a wise wirebonding sequence would be like this:
gnd
IO
gnd
IO
...
That is, the first pad to bond probably has to be a ground (unless there is a gate directly connected to gnd). This first bonding will probably (I hope) not hurt the IC (At this time there will only be a connection of the IC and the PCB via the adhesive - should the adhesive be electrically conductive or nor?) What is more, if the wirebonder head had some electrostatic voltage, it will probably be discharged.. So, the next bonding could be to a more sensitive IO pad.
If there is a process that accumulates charge in the wirebonder head, maybe after some time the voltage of the head is increased again. That's why I propose to bond successively one gnd after one IO pad, so that any accumulated charge gets away.
Another idea, especially useful for the first bonding could be to inverse the loop of the wire bonding. What I mean is, first touch the PCB, so that the voltages of pcb and wirebonder head equalize, and then the ic.
Maybe, the pcb can include shorts in a clever way, so that esd events take a more controlled current path.
Anyway, these are just thoughts, which I cannot evaluate...
So, if anyone has experience in wirebonding very sensitive ICs, I would appreciate if they could comment on my thoughts, if there is any reasoning behind them. Or, preferably, provide some tips that are known to have good results
Any answer is welcome!
Thank you very much in advance,
mixaloybas