winglj
Full Member level 4
transmission line attenuation
Hi, everyone. I have a question about characterize the attenuation of transmission line, such as waveguide or microstrip line.
For example, for the EM theory, the attenuation should be the real part of the complex propagation constant real(γ)=α. And it can be converted to dB by 20*log10(exp(α*z)), where z is the length of transmission line.
However, in the measurement or EM simulation, what it can be got is the S-parameters. So how can I get the attenuation from this data?
For example, I simulate an 1" microstrip line in HFSS. It shows that from the insertion loss is around -3.59 dB at 8GHz, but by using the formula 20*log10(exp(α*z)), the attenuation should be -0.19 dB/in. So which one is correct? Do I need to use advanced calibration to get the real attenuation from the insertion loss?
Thanks.
Hi, everyone. I have a question about characterize the attenuation of transmission line, such as waveguide or microstrip line.
For example, for the EM theory, the attenuation should be the real part of the complex propagation constant real(γ)=α. And it can be converted to dB by 20*log10(exp(α*z)), where z is the length of transmission line.
However, in the measurement or EM simulation, what it can be got is the S-parameters. So how can I get the attenuation from this data?
For example, I simulate an 1" microstrip line in HFSS. It shows that from the insertion loss is around -3.59 dB at 8GHz, but by using the formula 20*log10(exp(α*z)), the attenuation should be -0.19 dB/in. So which one is correct? Do I need to use advanced calibration to get the real attenuation from the insertion loss?
Thanks.