Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

About RF conditioning - specify the duplexer/triplexer

Status
Not open for further replies.

victorcl

Member level 1
Member level 1
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
41
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,601
About RF conditioning

Hi all,

I am quite new to RF conditioning. In order to solve the problems like BTS co-location or in other cases, which has a tighter requirements on certain bands, my task is to specify the duplexer/triplexer or the additional filter specifications. So I wonder if some of you who are familiar with this can provide some suggestion or advice on the rules to follow. It is better some book or slides can be provided.

Thanks a ton!
 

Re: About RF conditioning

I think, you cannot change the duplex spacing as the standard specifies duplex spacing for each band. may be you will be needing additional filters . For that you need to check for spurious and out of band components and check with standard specification. Find out how much they are exceeding the limits and make or buy filters according to that.
**broken link removed**
 

    victorcl

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
About RF conditioning

This is related to system design.
You can restrict the unwanted or condition at various levels like Duplexer and filter after LNA, filter before and after mixer, Digital filters after ADC, filter before demodulation.
You can fix for the one if you know the rest as it is cascaded effect.
 

    victorcl

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: About RF conditioning

GVVIN said:
I think, you cannot change the duplex spacing as the standard specifies duplex spacing for each band. may be you will be needing additional filters . For that you need to check for spurious and out of band components and check with standard specification. Find out how much they are exceeding the limits and make or buy filters according to that.
**broken link removed**

yes, that is right. Here I get another question that if I have found out how much they are exceeding the limits, then how can we get/ caculate the specifications of the filter? would you please set an example?
 

Re: About RF conditioning

As Kspalla wrote , if you are a designer you can correct for the unwanted frequencies at different stages. But if you are converting an existing system to some other band you have only duplexer and additional filters to play with.

how much rejection you need ... say you have a spuious at 2300 MHz which is above limit by 6 dB. you may need a band pass filter which passes ur desired frequency band and has a rejection of atleast 9db (including an additional 3dB margin) at 2300 MHz. If you can find the source of spurious and reduce there itself it will be the best method .
 

    victorcl

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
About RF conditioning

Based on the application let say it need to qualify the ETSI standard.
You know when it fails for out off band blocker requirement.
From this you will find the required attenuation at various offsets.
Hope this information helps you.
 

    victorcl

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: About RF conditioning

GVVIN said:
As Kspalla wrote , if you are a designer you can correct for the unwanted frequencies at different stages. But if you are converting an existing system to some other band you have only duplexer and additional filters to play with.

how much rejection you need ... say you have a spuious at 2300 MHz which is above limit by 6 dB. you may need a band pass filter which passes ur desired frequency band and has a rejection of atleast 9db (including an additional 3dB margin) at 2300 MHz. If you can find the source of spurious and reduce there itself it will be the best method .

yes, that hits the point. My task is mainly related to converting an existing system to certain requirements in some bands. and thanks for the examples.
I tried to search some materials about RF conditioning, but it is really difficult, especially those contain a lot of practical examples.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top