Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Why impulse response of analog components is not FIR

Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wajahat

Advanced Member level 4
Full Member level 1
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
102
Helped
3
Reputation
6
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,097
hi everyone ,i don't understand physically why the imopulse response of analog components like capaciter is not FIR .
Mathematically it is proved by laplace transform but physically there is no explanation known to me.
Any response would be helpful.
 

it could be some thing like Inertia of the real things in the real world
i.e. it doesn't response fastly , doesn't track the affecting event ....
that 's my thought ... :?:
 

Hi,

capacitor and inductor are memoryable elements.

FIR is a system that only functions at the present input but not previous states. It's memoryless.
 

    W

    wajahat

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
An imprtant feature of the FIR is that if the input goes to zero,the output will become zero immediatly. The capacitor doesn't acheive that. when the input is zero, the output will still exist(discharge response).this is IIR
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top