Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

What do you think about IE3D Zeland simulator ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Javirulo

Newbie level 6
Newbie level 6
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
14
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Spain
Activity points
1,399
What about IE3DZeland???

What do you think about this EMsimulator? I want to start using it because I need to do some designs for my company. Is IE3D a good and accurated simulator? I'd like to know all your opinions about this software , advantages and drawbacks, in order to decide if is IE3D the correct tool. Thanks a lot
 

What about IE3DZeland???

Hi Javirulo,

I think IE3D is a very good and user friendly software, I have used it for a while, and a friend of mine made some of his research on microstrip antenna using it. He used version 10 with evaluation license. He told me that it is accurate but it gives some shift in the resonant frequencies due to the assumption of infinite substrate. and infinite ground. However, it cannot be used with 3D structures, so if you are planning for 3D antennas (horn or parabolic), you should look for Microwave Studio, HFSS or FEKO.

Hope this might help,
Adel
 

    Javirulo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: What about IE3DZeland???

note that IE3D can handle many 3D problems. (otherwise why would they call it xx3D?)
 

    Javirulo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
What about IE3DZeland???

I don't know if IE3D can do 3D structures, that is a good information, thanks loucy, I will check this out.

However, I wanted to correct that HFSS and Microwave studio cannot be used with electrically large antennas such as parabolic antennas. I think the best would be a mix of EM and physical optics. I think this is done in Microstripes and superNEC.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top