Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Power detector (LTC5596 ) unwanted frequency

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

guytoub

Full Member level 2
Full Member level 2
Joined
Dec 23, 2004
Messages
124
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
937
Is it possible to restrict the operating range of a detector.
let me explain: currently I use an LTC5596 to detect a 9Ghz signal and I am polluted by all the wifi signals.
in fact I noticed that I picked up these signals at the entrance of my detector. how to avoid this? Thank you for your help.
 

Sort by date Sort by votes
Genereally use a band pass or high pass.

Not clear, what's the "entrance" of your detector? An intentional antenna? Or a badly designed PCB picking up waves from the enviroment?
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
FvM said:
Genereally use a band pass or high pass.

Not clear, what's the "entrance" of your detector? An intentional antenna? Or a badly designed PCB picking up waves from the enviroment?
Click to expand...
I have an antenna followed by a filter and an amplifier to adapt the signal. but my problem comes from the fact that I pick up the waves from the environment as you say.
 

    J

    JWHassler

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Upvote 0 Downvote
But where do you pick it up? Either the filter has insufficient stop band attenuation, then it should be improved. Or the signal is bypassing the filter, then the circuit should be better shielded.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
FvM said:
But where do you pick it up? Either the filter has insufficient stop band attenuation, then it should be improved. Or the signal is bypassing the filter, then the circuit should be better shielded.
Click to expand...
I pick it up on the input pin of the detector. with or without filter I have the same problem. I will try to put a cover on the detector to improve it.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
If the interferer signal comes through the antenna, I think a good high pass filter will do the job.
HPF have lower inband insertion loss and higher out-of-band rejection than simple BPF.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
vfone said:
If the interferer signal comes through the antenna, I think a good high pass filter will do the job.
HPF have lower inband insertion loss and higher out-of-band rejection than simple BPF.
Click to expand...
I checked all my chain, from the antenna, to the amplifier through the filter, I have no problem, the interfering signal passes through the input pin of the detector. I tried to put an electromagnetic cover, for the moment it is not yet satisfactory. I will see to add vias.
maybe also that my detector is too broad band to detect a desired signal at 9ghz.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top