Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Best commercial and free simulators for Verilog HDL

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

David83

Advanced Member level 1
Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Jan 21, 2011
Messages
410
Helped
45
Reputation
92
Reaction score
45
Trophy points
1,308
Activity points
3,639
Hello all,

What are the best commercial and free simulators for Verilog HDL?

Thanks in advance
 

David83 said:
Hello all,

What are the best commercial and free simulators for Verilog HDL?

Thanks in advance
Click to expand...

Modelsim - ubiquitous and supports both Linux and Windows PCs
VCS - very fast, nix only
Incisive - also very fast, nix only

Only free one I know of worth using is Icarus even then it doesn't support the latest standard nor does it support all of 2001.

You could have also looked at this before hand and perhaps gotten the answers you were looking for.

- - - Updated - - -

Let me amend that, looks like Icarus has improved support for 2001, but sill lacks anywhere near comprehensive support of 2005.
 
Thanks. That was helpful. I searched the Internet, and as usual beginners get lost.

A question: is there a big difference between Verliog and SystemVerilog? I started with Verilog, is it better to start with SystemVerilog?
 
SV is the current standard and is a superset of Verilog. SV has features specifically taylored to support verification.
 
ads-ee said:
SV is the current standard and is a superset of Verilog. SV has features specifically taylored to support verification.
Click to expand...

OK, so since SystemVerilog is a superset of Verilog, I guess I can start using Verilog for now to familiarize myself with the basics, and then I'll switch to SystemVerilog later.
 

I guess I can start using Verilog for now to familiarize myself with the basics
Click to expand...

For this requirement the following should suffice:

ModelSim PE Student Edition (Target the student editions for free stuff).
I don't know its performance as compared to Icarus.
 
dpaul said:
For this requirement the following should suffice:

ModelSim PE Student Edition (Target the student editions for free stuff).
I don't know its performance as compared to Icarus.
Click to expand...

That's right. I downloaded it. It seems good. I also downloaded Icarus. I didn't read through the documentation, but I couldn't find the editor interface (when I double clicked the icon on my desktop, the folder of the program opened up, but there was no GUI). I guess it's used through the command line?!!

Question: what is hardware verification? We use the stimulus module to test the design module. Is verification something else?
 

We use the stimulus module to test the design module. Is verification something else?
Click to expand...
That is called functional verification. You provide various stimulus to your DUT via a test-bench and then observe the output signals how they behave, whether they are performing the intended functions or not.

A test-bench might not cover all the corner-cases of a design. This is where SystemVerilog and hardware verification comes in. They will simulate the DUT with all possible input vectors and observe the results. Lots of bugs can crop up in a designed DUT if it has not been carefully coded.
 

dpaul said:
That is called functional verification. You provide various stimulus to your DUT via a test-bench and then observe the output signals how they behave, whether they are performing the intended functions or not.

A test-bench might not cover all the corner-cases of a design. This is where SystemVerilog and hardware verification comes in. They will simulate the DUT with all possible input vectors and observe the results. Lots of bugs can crop up in a designed DUT if it has not been carefully coded.
Click to expand...

And all the possible inputs are provided automatically or by someone?


So a designer would do verification or will leave it to someone else? Because I find job titles as ASIC designer engineer, and ASIC verification engineer, as if the two are separate.
 

David83 said:
And all the possible inputs are provided automatically or by someone?


So a designer would do verification or will leave it to someone else? Because I find job titles as ASIC designer engineer, and ASIC verification engineer, as if the two are separate.
Click to expand...

both are separate and for good reasons. you don't want to verify the code you wrote, that would be biased. the exception might be if you work for a tiny company where everyone does everything.
 

ThisIsNotSam said:
both are separate and for good reasons. you don't want to verify the code you wrote, that would be biased. the exception might be if you work for a tiny company where everyone does everything.
Click to expand...

So, basically, as ASIC design engineer can work as an ASIC verification engineer, and vice versa, right?
 

David83 said:
So, basically, as ASIC design engineer can work as an ASIC verification engineer, and vice versa, right?
Click to expand...

very few people would have the skills to be good at both. in general, no, no designer would do the work of a verification guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top