Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

What is the difference between psynopt and place_opt commands in ICC?

Status
Not open for further replies.
V

vterminater

Junior Member level 1
Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
19
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,413
My confusion is that i think both commands do the same. place_opt : optimizes placement of cells to improve timing, congestion. psynopt : Does incremental optimization of cells to improve timing and congestion. Then what is the difference!!? Is it the way they work? Please help me out on this.
 

cyrax747 said:
psynopt is for further fine tuning of design apart from place_opt
Click to expand...

Place_opt*(works on physical aspect,{placement, buffer insertion, removal})
Psynopt: Incremental Logic Optimization (like synthesis :works on logic)

Is the above right?
This will help me understand the concept behind these commands, also if i can skip place_opt and run only psynopt or vice-versa.
 

Hi,

I think place_opt doesnt do buffer removal,there is separate command for it.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top