Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission measurem

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

rinjic

Junior Member level 1
Junior Member level 1
Joined
Oct 3, 2004
Messages
18
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
125
I am just starting to use network analyzer (agilent 8722ES) to measure the S parameters of some materials in coaxial line. I put the ring sample inside the coaxial line and measure S11 and S21. Usually I have several peaks in S-parameter amplitude graph because of the resonance inside the sample. Then I disconnect the coaxial line. reinstall the sample and repeat the measurement again. I found out that the peak position shift about 20MHz (forgot to say, the frequency range I used is 0.5-18GHz). I repeat lots of times, almost all of them have a random small peak shift(either positive or negative shift).
The question is : Is this normal in S parameter measurement?
If it is not, is this because of the system error in network analyzer? Or is it caused by my falsed connection between cable and coaxial line?
I don't have too much experience with network analyzer, so any suggestion and advice will be very helpful. Thanks
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

you can try to fix the coaxial cable connecting the VNA and the probe. We got same problem too. The location,shape of the this connecting cable changes, you can see the S-paramter got from VNA changes also, quite annoying.
Best Regards,
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

The answer may be splitted into 2 topics:
- The measuring method
- The tip & trips

The measuring method is mainly related to the calibration method, SOLT, TRL, E-Cal, etc.
Generally the U(s11) (uncertainty related to s11) is higher if the observed value is near the external Smith-Chart's circle.
A TRL Calibration is one of the most accurate.
SOLT is less accurate than TRL but still remain very accurate.
Agilent TRL* has poor accuracy for high values of s11.
To be accurate when you observe high values of s11, try a SOLT and a
S, offset S,L,T and compare the results.
To be accurate when you observe low values of s11, try a S,O,slidingL,T,
...

tip&trips
instrument coax cables and connectors should be in exellent conditions.
Also the Standards should be in exellent conditions.
Don't move the coax cables. Fix it in many points with scotch tape. Dont' make any torsion to the coax. Be the contact metals cleans. Etc. Etc.

Set sweep mode to step, set power > -10 dBm,
Read Agilent AN 1287 series
Read Agilent AN "Principles of connectors care"
Read Agilent PN 8510 series
 

    R

    rinjic

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

Hi sergio mariotti,

Quote: "@gilent TRL* has poor accuracy for high values of s11"
Please explain shortly why is it so.
Thanks
g579
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

sergio mariotti said:
The answer may be splitted into 2 topics:
- The measuring method
- The tip & trips

The measuring method is mainly related to the calibration method, SOLT, TRL, E-Cal, etc.
Generally the U(s11) (uncertainty related to s11) is higher if the observed value is near the external Smith-Chart's circle.
A TRL Calibration is one of the most accurate.
SOLT is less accurate than TRL but still remain very accurate.
@gilent TRL* has poor accuracy for high values of s11.
To be accurate when you observe high values of s11, try a SOLT and a
S, offset S,L,T and compare the results.
To be accurate when you observe low values of s11, try a S,O,slidingL,T,
...

tip&trips
instrument coax cables and connectors should be in exellent conditions.
Also the Standards should be in exellent conditions.
Don't move the coax cables. Fix it in many points with scotch tape. Dont' make any torsion to the coax. Be the contact metals cleans. Etc. Etc.

Set sweep mode to step, set power > -10 dBm,
Read @gilent AN 1287 series
Read @gilent AN "Principles of connectors care"
Read @gilent PN 8510 series
Click to expand...
can you give some comments about the fluctuation of VNA reading when cable connecting the VNA and probe moving?
Best Regards,
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

hi mariotti,
thanks for ur advice. I already fixed the cable, and the cal. kit and connector are in very good condition. I tryed SOLT, but the situation is not getting better, there still has like 20MHz uncertainty.
Do u have more suggestions?

Rinji
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

To: asdfaaa:
coax cable: quality grade: the best for measurement. If I remember well the values... a smooth 90° bend may vary |s21| of a quantity LESS THAN 0.01dB*GHZ+0.05 : Of course this value is too high. But in practice the |s21| variation is very smaller than the guarantee.
As the cable is "good" as the |s21| variation is smaller than guarantee.
I.e. a never used GoreTex cable, not bent from Cal to Measure, show a |s21| variation less than 0.03 at 22 GHz after 10 minutes.

To: rinjic
If you have a 3 samplers (or mixers) VNA, like hp 87xx whit NO opt 400 installed, a ripple may be given by the instrument. That ripple may by in the range of +/-0.1 dB around the |s21| and/or +/- 0.03 (linear) around |s11| (look the s11 on Smith Chart )

But... are you sure that the ripple is generated by the VNA? May be the real response of the DUT?
To undertand better, coul'd you post a plot of your measurement?
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

rinjic,
As you said the peaks come from resonances of the ring. If the peaks move it means the resonance frequency is moved. I suppose the exact resonance frequency is a function of the material and its dimensions and also the edges condition around it. When you took off and put back the ring, it might moved a litte bit toword one side and it changed its resonant frequency.
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

DJ said:
rinjic,
As you said the peaks come from resonances of the ring. If the peaks move it means the resonance frequency is moved. I suppose the exact resonance frequency is a function of the material and its dimensions and also the edges condition around it. When you took off and put back the ring, it might moved a litte bit toword one side and it changed its resonant frequency.
Click to expand...

Yes, a little bit position change of the ring will influence the result. But it is just for the phase. The magnitude of S parameters should still be the same since the length of the ring doesn't change, right? Correct me if my understanding is wrong. Thanks!

rinjic
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

sergio mariotti said:
To: asdfaaa:

To: rinjic
If you have a 3 samplers (or mixers) VNA, like hp 87xx whit NO opt 400 installed, a ripple may be given by the instrument. That ripple may by in the range of +/-0.1 dB around the |s21| and/or +/- 0.03 (linear) around |s11| (look the s11 on Smith Chart )

But... are you sure that the ripple is generated by the VNA? May be the real response of the DUT?
To undertand better, coul'd you post a plot of your measurement?
Click to expand...

I think it is not due to the DUT because I tried using other materials. The ripple is always there. Next time I measure them, I will post a plot here. But do u think it is possible the cable has a problem? if it does, how can I check it? Thanks for ur help!

rinjic
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

rinjic said:
sergio mariotti said:
To: asdfaaa:

To: rinjic
If you have a 3 samplers (or mixers) VNA, like hp 87xx whit NO opt 400 installed, a ripple may be given by the instrument. That ripple may by in the range of +/-0.1 dB around the |s21| and/or +/- 0.03 (linear) around |s11| (look the s11 on Smith Chart )

But... are you sure that the ripple is generated by the VNA? May be the real response of the DUT?
To undertand better, coul'd you post a plot of your measurement?
Click to expand...

I think it is not due to the DUT because I tried using other materials. The ripple is always there. Next time I measure them, I will post a plot here. But do u think it is possible the cable has a problem? if it does, how can I check it? Thanks for ur help!

rinjic
Click to expand...
There is a rough check test wrote on the user manual of the Agilent (formally GoreTex) cables.
Now i'have not acces to that manual, but to check the cable i suggest this procedure:
1) set the VNA be fast as possible (no avg, wider IF, few points, analog sweep etc.)
2) dismount the cable from the VNA test port.
3) calibrate the VNA, 1port, SOL
4) connect the cable to VNA test port and close the other end to a short
5) choose a convenient visualizzation format (i.e mag & phase or smith chart whit appropriate cable extension)
6) bend the cable, 1, 2, 3 ... times and observe what happen.
7) compare the observed with another "good" cable.
8) repeat the same procedure but exchange the end short with a load.
10) look for "false contact". A false contact on the shield, is usually seen as a bad return loss at low freq.
9) check machanically the coax connectors, remove dirty, check with gage, check the integrity of the central pin, check for dirty inside the female slots, be critic, and, most important, READ carefully Agilent AN "PRICIPLES OF CONNECTORS CARE"
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

hi mariotti,
I searched agilent website and didn't find "principles of connectors care" Application Note. The only thing I found is a training course overview of "cable and connector care" which is not the Application Note. I also looked my VNA manual, it does say something about the care but not too much. Could u please upload "principles of connectors care" here?
Thanks !

rinjic
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

Hi marotti,

Please answer my question repeated here:

You stated, that
"@gilent TRL* has poor accuracy for high values of s11"

Please explain shortly why is it so, and where can I get info on that statement.
Thanks
g579
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

g579 said:
Hi marotti,

Please answer my question repeated here:

You stated, that
"@gilent TRL* has poor accuracy for high values of s11"

Please explain shortly why is it so, and where can I get info on that statement.
Thanks
g579
Click to expand...

Look at attacched file, fig. 8, the s11 is closer to ext. circle than s22.
The s11 "ripple" is larger than s22 ripple.
I've experienced the same observation. In my experience the ripple (say peak to peak mismatch uncertainty) was similar to the same obtained from a lower cost SNA.
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

rinjic said:
hi mariotti,
I searched @gilent website and didn't find "principles of connectors care" Application Note. The only thing I found is a training course overview of "cable and connector care" which is not the Application Note. I also looked my VNA manual, it does say something about the care but not too much. Could u please upload "principles of connectors care" here?
Thanks !

rinjic
Click to expand...

Here you are the req. AN . It's very old and badly scanned (original from Agilent)

Please , tell me if you have opt. 400 installed or not.
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

Hi marotti,

thanks for the info and the insight of the ripple in the attached HP product Note.
Thanks
g579
 

Re: help! the "error" in 2 ports transmission meas

do y calibrate the VNA,and set the correct output power?
then fix the cable
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top