Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

[SOLVED] what is the advantage of a direct conversion receiver

Status
Not open for further replies.
O

obrien135

Full Member level 5
Full Member level 5
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
240
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Connecticut
Activity points
3,259
what is the advantage of a direct conversion receiver ( the kind with a local oscillator and a "zero frequency IF") over a tuned RF receiver, or by that I mean a receiver that doesn't use a LO?

George
 

A direct conversion receiver can be smaller and less expensive than a standard super heterodyne tuner. Note they both use LO, one for the direct conversion, and at least two for the superhet.
 
But without the IF section how does it have more sensitivty or selectivity than a simple tuned RF receiver?
 

obrien135 said:
But without the IF section how does it have more sensitivty or selectivity than a simple tuned RF receiver?
Click to expand...

The smaller size and lower cost don't come for free :)

Superhet tuners are used when performance is paramount.
 
But I'm trying to get a comparison between Direct conversion (with a LO) and a tuned RF, not a direct conversion and a superhet. Is the LO / mixer is the direct conversion receiver nothing more than a beat frequency oscillator that is just a way to demodulate the rf? If so, is it really that much better than a diode detector?
 

I see, when you said tuned RF, I was thinking a traditional (superhet) tuner. Could you clarify what you mean by tuned RF? Thanks.
 
If I am not mistaken, a TRF receiver is just a tuner (and sometimes an amp followed by another tuner with the same resonant frequency and another amp, or perhaps several such circuits), followed by a detector and then an audio amp and speaker
 

Direct downconversion is just simple and cheap. You don't have to worry about image frequencies, and you can set the channel bandwidth easily using baseband filters instead of IF bandpass filters.

But if you only want to do simple envelope/magnitude detection (like with a diode detector), then direct downconversion probably doesn't offer much benefit. To recover the envelope you need to sample both I/Q channels and calculate it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top