Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Semi-rigid coaxials, dimensions vs frequencies

Status
Not open for further replies.

neazoi

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
4,155
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
15
Trophy points
1,318
Location
Greece
Activity points
37,164
Does anyone has a table with Semi-rigid coaxials, dimensions vs frequencies?
Does internal diameter have to do with the frequency?
 

Working frequency range of coaxial waveguide is limited by minimum wavelength λmin≈π*(D+d)/2. Where D is outer diameter, d is inner diameter. For wavelength<λmin, higher types of waves are excited in coaxial waveguide.

Here graphics of attenuation vs frequency.
View attachment SUCOFORM_S43_66.pdf
 
  • Like
Reactions: neazoi

    neazoi

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Its a big problem when using high power (> 50KW) TV transmitters ( Fc > 500 MHz). At a placed i worked at the older Txs had 6 1/8" feedery, the later generation had a lot of wave guide - It was HUGE ! (.9 X .6 m?)
Frank
 
  • Like
Reactions: neazoi

    neazoi

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
on ebay I find two diameters, ones with 0.141'' and ones with 0.086''
Are they both suitable for 10GHz? (lengths less than 10cm)
Which of them are better for 10GHz?
 

Refer to Micro-Coax for a more complete semi-rigid portfolio. **broken link removed**
 
  • Like
Reactions: neazoi

    neazoi

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
All their cables, on both diameters are suited greater than 20GHz, so I guess all are good to 10GHz
 

Cable 0.141" has lower insertion loss than cable 0.086". But for lengths less than 10cm with connectors this difference is not significant, and cable 0.086" has lower bending radius for ease of installation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neazoi

    neazoi

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top