Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Enhancing IC Reliability: Advanced Techniques in Design for Testability (DFT)

Screen Shot 2024-09-08 at 22.13.48.png
Screen Shot 2024-09-08 at 22.13.48.png
As an RTL Synthesis engineer in the integrated circuit (IC) industry, implementing Design for Testability (DFT) is crucial for ensuring that designs are testable and maintainable. This blog explores advanced DFT techniques, focusing on specific case studies and the latest cutting-edge technologies in digital design.

Importance of Design for Testability​

Design for Testability involves incorporating specific design techniques and features that make it easier to test the functionality of an IC. DFT is essential for detecting manufacturing defects, ensuring product reliability, and reducing test costs. Effective DFT techniques facilitate thorough testing, allowing for quicker identification and resolution of issues.

Advanced Techniques in Design for Testability​

1. Scan Chain Insertion
Scan chains are a fundamental DFT technique used to improve the controllability and observability of internal states in a design. By inserting scan chains, engineers can shift test vectors into the flip-flops and capture the results for analysis.

Case Study:
A semiconductor company used Synopsys' DFT Compiler to insert scan chains in their multi-core processor design. The tool's automated features enabled the company to integrate scan chains efficiently, significantly enhancing their ability to detect and diagnose faults during testing. The implementation of scan chains also improved their test coverage and reduced test time.

Implementation:
Automated Tools:
Utilize tools like Synopsys' DFT Compiler for automated scan chain insertion.
Custom Scan Chains:Develop custom scan chain configurations to optimize coverage and performance.

2. Built-In Self-Test (BIST)
Built-In Self-Test (BIST) is a technique where test generation and response analysis are built into the hardware. BIST allows for on-chip testing, which can be crucial for complex designs and hard-to-reach areas.

Case Study:
An automotive electronics manufacturer implemented BIST in their safety-critical systems using Mentor Graphics' Tessent. The BIST approach allowed them to perform at-speed testing and detect timing-related faults that would be challenging to identify using traditional methods. This approach significantly improved the reliability of their safety-critical ICs.

Implementation:
BIST Integration:
Integrate BIST circuitry during the design phase to enable self-testing capabilities.
At-Speed Testing:Use BIST for at-speed testing to detect timing-related faults.

3. Memory BIST (MBIST)
Memory BIST (MBIST) specifically targets the testing of embedded memories within an IC. MBIST techniques are crucial for ensuring the integrity and performance of memory components, which are often the most vulnerable to defects.

Case Study:
A consumer electronics company utilized Cadence's Modus DFT Software Solution for implementing MBIST in their next-generation SoC. The automated MBIST insertion and verification significantly reduced their development cycle and improved the test coverage of embedded memories, ensuring higher product reliability.

Implementation:
Automated MBIST Tools:
Use tools like Cadence's Modus for automated MBIST insertion and verification.
Custom MBIST Algorithms:Develop custom algorithms to target specific memory fault models.
Innovative Approaches in DFT
1. Hierarchical DFT
Hierarchical DFT involves partitioning the design into smaller blocks, each with its own DFT features, and then integrating these blocks at the top level. This approach simplifies the DFT process for complex SoCs.

Case Study:
A network processor company employed hierarchical DFT techniques using Synopsys' DFTMAX. By partitioning their design into manageable blocks and applying DFT at each level, they achieved higher test coverage and simplified their overall DFT strategy. This method also facilitated parallel development and reduced the overall test integration time.

Implementation:
Partitioning:
Divide the design into smaller, manageable blocks for DFT.
Integration: Integrate the DFT-enabled blocks at the top level to ensure comprehensive test coverage.

2. Low Power DFT
With the increasing emphasis on low power design, incorporating DFT techniques that account for power constraints is critical. Low power DFT ensures that test activities do not violate power budgets and can help in detecting power-related faults.

Case Study:
A leading semiconductor company used Mentor Graphics' Tessent Power to implement low power DFT in their latest mobile processor design. The tool enabled them to insert power-aware DFT features that minimized power consumption during testing and ensured that power-related faults were effectively detected.

Implementation:
Power-Aware Tools:
Use tools like Tessent Power to incorporate low power DFT techniques.
Dynamic Power Management:Implement DFT features that support dynamic power management during testing.
About author
Peng Yu
With a wealth of experience in formal verification projects, I specialize in two critical solutions: formal signoff with full proof and formal signoff with coverage. Throughout my career, I have successfully tackled a diverse range of designs, including Instruction units, Standard interfaces, User-defined interfaces, Bus matrices, Caches, MMUs, Schedulers, DMA controllers, Memory controllers, Interrupt controllers, Power management units, and various specific functional modules.

Drawing on this extensive project experience and a deep understanding of various design types, I have developed a unique formal verification methodology. This methodology has been honed through practical application and has proven highly effective in ensuring design correctness and efficiency.

One of my key achievements has been the independent creation of a comprehensive formal verification IP library. This library comprises nearly 200 units, encompassing basic, common, VIP, and flow libraries. These resources, combined with my methodology, have been successfully deployed in the product development workflows of numerous leading chip companies. The results speak for themselves, with significant improvements in verification effectiveness and performance observed across the board.

My goal is to share this expertise with students at EDA Academy, providing them with practical insights and industry best practices that they can apply directly to their own projects. By imparting this knowledge, I aim to empower learners to achieve their verification goals with confidence and efficiency.

EDA Academy:https://www.eda-academy.com
Explore our current Formal Verification courses:
  1. Introduction to Formal Verification
  2. Formal Verification: SVA Coding
  3. Formal Verification: PSL Coding

Comments

There are no comments to display.

Part and Inventory Search

Blog entry information

Author
Peng Yu
Read time
3 min read
Views
156
Last update

More entries in Uncategorized

More entries from Peng Yu

Share this entry

Back
Top