neazoi
Advanced Member level 6
I like the homebrew way and the flexibility of both techniques.
Manhattan: copper clad,PCB,metal shear,metal nibbler,metal punch,soldering iron,super glue
Dead bug: **broken link removed**
But the problem with Manhattan style is these little pads that separate the components from the PCB ground. They all act as capacitors which is not good for high frequencies.
The problem with dead bug is that it is not very mechanically stable as Manhattan.
I have found another homebrew technique in old books but I do not not know how this is called. It uses a double sided PCB which is better for RF too. Here is a picture. Do you know how this method is called?
http://www.microwave-museum.org/hirespics/mwm0018.jpg
Attached is a more clear picture
Manhattan: copper clad,PCB,metal shear,metal nibbler,metal punch,soldering iron,super glue
Dead bug: **broken link removed**
But the problem with Manhattan style is these little pads that separate the components from the PCB ground. They all act as capacitors which is not good for high frequencies.
The problem with dead bug is that it is not very mechanically stable as Manhattan.
I have found another homebrew technique in old books but I do not not know how this is called. It uses a double sided PCB which is better for RF too. Here is a picture. Do you know how this method is called?
http://www.microwave-museum.org/hirespics/mwm0018.jpg
Attached is a more clear picture