Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
i have them all. I just need to find the link for you
EDIT : I found it. here it is : Maloberti: http://ims.unipv.it/Microelettronica/Dataconverters1.html
Hello guys,
The total Noise floor that is given by the course I am enrolled now is :
Noise Floor = Man_made:noise+KTB-Noise_Margin-----(1)
here I think it is a mistake because for me the noise margin is a margin to have a security margin in case our signal drops below and should be written as...
Thank you both. Those two arrows are explained as that whenever we have a frequency d which is between certain value, with the violation of Nyquist criteria, we get a phase aliasing. my objective was to simulate that in Matlab for better understanding
I understood that. What I am trying to see is how the last 2 case introduce phase aliasing by itself. You did write the -PI/4 in the code, is t phase aliasing happening automatically in case 4 and f?
1659525126
Thank you for your feedback.
what I am trying to see by simulating is the phase...
Thank you.
But the theory here says if I change the sampling frequency without changing f(must be set to 4 as constant) we should observe a phase conjugate due to low sampling rate
Hello Guys,
So after reading this article Sampling and Aliasing at page 30; I could not reproduce the where the phase has a conjugate value of the origial phase at Fs/2<f<Fs which result in :
fa = Fs − f, fa is the aliased frequency
Za = Z
so my code is here:
Fs1=30; % original sampling...
sorry for my late answer. Was very busy.
in the second case, you mentioned that :
Corollary, G < 1 then each time thru loop less and less is added
to Vs coming out of the summer, and ultimately the loop simple settles to Vs flowing
around loop, eg. stable.
I do not understand this correctly...
Thanks for your answer, Dana.
I am still confused about it.
First, if Vs=0 then Vo =Vs*A/(1-AB) which means A/(1-AB) must be different from 0,which means that AB #1!! so where I am getting wrong?
second, quote "
If you satisfied the angle criteria, 0, or N x 360 degrees (N is integer), but had a...
Hello everyone,
SO I am reading this article on negative feedback and the criteria to be stable.
I have not fully understood why if the loop gain at -180degree if the loop gain is less than 1 can be stable. why? because for me when the feedback has a shift phase of -180 and even the loop gain is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
